cataluña web services llc contact us site map
 

 


services
web site design
print design

web sites
printed materials

articles
web tips
links
blog

about us
mission
testimonials

general conditions
acceptable use
bullet SEO/SER form

Do You Prefer A Pretty Or Successful Web Site?
by Lawrence Schoeffler
forward by Brooke Long

 

FORWARD:
Does A Pretty Web Site = A Successful Web Site?

There is an article below that I have some concerns about. I pretty much agree with everything that has been said here - but I feel that it has left out an important concept.

People enter you site because of the content - they stay because they can find that content easily.

The content is the primary item you need to be concerned with and look is secondary. This is true. But the look is broken in two categories: Function and Aesthetics.

You need to concern yourself with function. The site has to be navigable. The visitor has to be able to find their way around. They should know at all times: where they are, where they are going, and where they have been. The functioning of the web site is equally important to the content. You might have great content - but if the visitor cannot find it then your site does neither you or your visitor any good. After the function you can start worrying about the aesthetics. Color, animations, graphics etc.

So read this article below. It is very good - it is just missing what I have stated above!


Some agents feel the appearance of their web site is the deciding factor in how well visitors respond. They tend to judge their site on its artistic merit, rather than as a marketing tool. Make this error and watch your return on investment (ROI) plummet.

If you view your web site from an artist's point of view, you'll probably be unhappy with most site designs. The web is about information, and design is generally secondary. For example, a common complaint from art-minded agents about the web is, "it looks cluttered," and "there's not enough white space."

I can understand this. It's your web site. You want something that you feel good associating yourself with. It's part of your image.

But most web site visitors don't care how artistic or unique your site is. If they did, then sites like Yahoo!, MSN, and Realtor.com would be nowhere. Have you looked at Yahoo! lately? Talk about plain-jane. And MSN - is there a more cluttered home page out there? I doubt it. Realtor.com will never win any design awards either.

These companies live and die on how responsive their sites are. And that's the point: So do you. People surfing the Web and coming to your site want information. If you make appearance the most important feature of your web site, you could be sacrificing something more important: Return On Investment.

When visitors find your site, you want them to stay for a long time and look at lots of pages. The more they do this, the greater the chance they'll fill out a form, and become a lead. That's the whole point.

You're no different, ultimately, than Yahoo!, MSN, and Realtor.com. They want visitors to stay, look at lots of pages, and respond in some manner, such as filling out a form. Or else they go out of business. Understanding this, what are they doing with their Web sites? Are they design masterpieces? No. Instead, these leading sites focus on presenting visitors with lots and lots of content. Their web pages are completely packed with links and resources. There's no "white space" that isn't filled.

Take a clue from sites that live and die - and have the money and research to back it up - on how "sticky" and responsive their sites are: Their motto seems to be the more content on the pages, the better. Appearance is obviously a lower priority.

Of course, appearance being secondary doesn't mean it is of no importance. Your Web site should certainly be entirely professional in appearance. And the more leading edge the better. Image does make a difference. I'm talking about priorities.

If you make appearance primary, you'll end up spending your Internet budget on design, and forget that your site is primarily a marketing tool, which means it will ultimately be judged on three things:

  1. Marketing power and reach, or how many visitors it attracts
  2. Responsiveness, or what percentage of visitors fill out forms and become leads
  3. ROI, or how much in total sales you can attribute to your site.

The design or appearance of your site plays only a supporting role. When you make it center stage, traffic and response suffers - your visitors want information, not art.

The next time you look at your Web site and get concerned that the design is "too cluttered" or that it "doesn't have enough white space," I suggest you reconsider. What is more important to you: appearance or results? If you are after results, fill up your site with as much relevant, high quality, and timely information as you possibly can.


Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter today!

© Cataluña 1999